Gebhardt did not offer further element about the character of his clients’ complaints about the Capitol Law enforcement department or the retaliation he suggests they confront, beyond his allegations of two prospective firings.
But a independent letter — despatched by a person who submitted a whistleblower report to Congress regarding the Capitol Law enforcement previously this yr, and who is not Gebhardt’s client — consists of detailed allegations about the type of retaliation that law enforcement intelligence whistleblowers now face. That letter, which POLITICO reviewed and has not beforehand been described, has been sent to the Jan. 6 find committee, as properly as the Property Administration Committee and the Senate Regulations Committee.
Dated Nov. 8, that letter said Capitol Law enforcement intelligence analysts have created at the very least 93 grievances about “abuse and mismanagement of the USCP intelligence operations” ahead of and following Jan. 6. These issues have gone to section supervisors, the department’s Business office of Professional Responsibility, the department’s inspector basic and congressional committees.
“The analysts experienced overpowering intelligence indicating that armed militia was heading to assault in drive to seize the Capitol,” the letter reads. “This was dismissed by the ‘experts’ commanding the IICD.”
The letter states there is a “culture of retaliation and intimidation” in the department’s intelligence division.
In the months before the assault, Capitol Law enforcement put in new management at the intelligence division who commenced to overhaul it. By mid-November, the unit’s new main “was laying out new priorities,” CNN described.
The letter POLITICO reviewed cites the reorganization as a main variable contributing to the failure of Capitol Law enforcement to identify the gravity of the threat posed on Jan. 6 and to prepare appropriately. Ahead of that reorganization, in accordance to the letter, “there experienced under no circumstances been an intelligence failure related to demonstrations.”
“The failure of the 6th is a stark distinction to the historical results of this unit, but this failure was not on the analysts,” the letter reads. “They provided extra than enough extremely unique warning. No, the intelligence failure rest [sic] squarely on the IICD leadership.”
“The true heartbreak write-up January 6th is the ongoing retaliation and intimidation that continues against most members of the IICD that sounded the alarms about the intelligence and disorganization prior to tragedies of January 6th,” the letter adds.
A spokesperson for the Capitol Law enforcement declined to remark, citing the likelihood of litigation.
Federal law presents sizeable protections to folks who get the job done in the government department and file whistleblower grievances. But staff in the legislative branch — which consists of Capitol Law enforcement staff — enjoy considerably fewer security.
Gebhardt, the lawyer, stated this is a difficulty.
“There requires to be much more strong whistleblower protections for staff members in the legislative department,” he advised POLITICO.